C v R1 and R2 (England and Wales : Race Discrimination) [2025] UKET 3302696/2022 (21 March 2025)

[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] United Kingdom Employment Tribunal You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Tribunal >> C v R1 and R2 (England and Wales : Race Discrimination) [2025] UKET 3302696/2022 (21 March...

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2025] UKET 3302696/2022
Parties: Claimant: C; Respondent: R1; Respondent: R2
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 21 March 2025
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Topics: Race Discrimination, Unfair Treatment at Work

Employment Law Equality Law Race Discrimination Unfair Treatment at Work

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 1

Parties

Claimant

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was subjected to race discrimination by the respondents in the course of employment

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.