Ms D Paulauskiene v Raduga Ltd and other (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Contract of Employment : Flexible Working : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 3200706/2016 (24 March 2017)

The tribunal found that the respondent breached the contract of employment and made unlawful deductions from wages, and failed to comply with the Working Time Regulations.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 3200706/2016
Parties: Claimant: Ms D Paulauskiene; Respondent: Raduga Ltd and other
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 24 March 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld in part
Legal Topics: Breach of Contract, Contract of Employment, Flexible Working, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Working Time Regulations

Employment Law Breach of Contract Contract of Employment Flexible Working Unlawful Deduction From Wages Working Time Regulations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Ms D Paulauskiene

Claimant

Raduga Ltd and other

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether there was a breach of contract
2 Whether there was an unlawful deduction from wages
3 Whether the Working Time Regulations were breached

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondent breached the contract of employment and made unlawful deductions from wages, and failed to comply with the Working Time Regulations.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld in part

Orders

Respondent to pay compensation for unlawful deduction from wages
Respondent to rectify breach of contract

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.