Shenzhen Foscam Intelligent Technology Co.,Ltd v Ravat Trading (Appeal for case D00019217 _Appeal: Overturned - No Action) [2018] DRS 19217 (14 May 2018)
The appeal panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the respondent's registration was abusive or in bad faith and therefore overturned the original decision.
- Citation
- [2018] DRS 19217
- Parties
- Complainant: Shenzhen Foscam Intelligent Technology Co.,Ltd; Respondent: Ravat Trading
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 May 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; original decision overturned; no action taken
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Shenzhen Foscam Intelligent Technology Co.,Ltd
Complainant
Ravat Trading
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registration by the respondent was abusive or in bad faith
- 2 Whether the complainant had rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the respondent's registration was abusive or in bad faith and therefore overturned the original decision.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; original decision overturned; no action taken
Orders
- No action to be taken regarding the domain name
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment