Yates v Revenue and Customs (VAT - PENALTIES : Default surcharge) [2016] UKFTT 531 (TC) (25 July 2016)
The appellant did not have a reasonable excuse for the late VAT returns and payments. Reliance on his partner or accountant is expressly excluded as a reasonable excuse by statute. The failure of HMRC to contact the appellant earlier does not relieve him of his statutory obligations. The appeal is therefore dismissed.
- Citation
- [2016] UKFTT 531
- Parties
- Appellant: Ray Yates; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 25 July 2016
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Full Written Decision After Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- VAT, Default Surcharge, Penalties, Reasonable Excuse, Reliance on Third Parties
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ray Yates
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Full Written Decision After Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant had a reasonable excuse for late VAT returns and payments
- 2 Whether reliance on a third party or lack of HMRC contact constitutes a reasonable excuse under VATA 1994
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant did not have a reasonable excuse for the late VAT returns and payments. Reliance on his partner or accountant is expressly excluded as a reasonable excuse by statute. The failure of HMRC to contact the appellant earlier does not relieve him of his statutory obligations. The appeal is therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment