Yates v Revenue and Customs (VAT - PENALTIES : Default surcharge) [2016] UKFTT 531 (TC) (25 July 2016)

Yates v Revenue and Customs (VAT - PENALTIES : Default surcharge) [2016] UKFTT 531 (TC) (25 July 2016)

The appellant did not have a reasonable excuse for the late VAT returns and payments. Reliance on his partner or accountant is expressly excluded as a reasonable excuse by statute. The failure of HMRC to contact the appellant earlier does not relieve him of his statutory obligations. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Citation
[2016] UKFTT 531
Parties
Appellant: Ray Yates; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
25 July 2016
Procedural Posture
VAT Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Full Written Decision After Extension of Time
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
VAT, Default Surcharge, Penalties, Reasonable Excuse, Reliance on Third Parties

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ray Yates

Appellant

The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Respondents

Procedural Posture

VAT Penalty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Full Written Decision After Extension of Time

  1. 1 Whether the appellant had a reasonable excuse for late VAT returns and payments
  2. 2 Whether reliance on a third party or lack of HMRC contact constitutes a reasonable excuse under VATA 1994

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant did not have a reasonable excuse for the late VAT returns and payments. Reliance on his partner or accountant is expressly excluded as a reasonable excuse by statute. The failure of HMRC to contact the appellant earlier does not relieve him of his statutory obligations. The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed