Mr M Zmuda v Rayburn Trading Ltd (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2023] UKET 2405045/2022 (5 April 2023)

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by the legislation and therefore was not subjected to detriment or dismissal for whistleblowing.

Citation: [2023] UKET 2405045/2022
Parties: Claimant: Mr M Zmuda; Respondent: Rayburn Trading Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 05 April 2023
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim dismissed
Legal Topics: Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing

Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Whistleblowing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr M Zmuda

Claimant

Rayburn Trading Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was subjected to detriment or dismissal for making a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by the legislation and therefore was not subjected to detriment or dismissal for whistleblowing.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed