QSoft Consulting Limited v Realphangan (Full Decision _Transfer) [2011] DRS 9326 (31 January 2011)
The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name or mark and that the domain name was identical or similar. The respondent's registration was found to be abusive due to lack of response and evidence of bad faith.
- Citation
- [2011] DRS 9326
- Parties
- Complainant: QSoft Consulting Limited; Respondent: Realphangan
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld; domain name ordered to be transferred to complainant.
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
QSoft Consulting Limited
Complainant
Realphangan
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the respondent's registration or use of the domain name is abusive
Ratio Decidendi
The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name or mark and that the domain name was identical or similar. The respondent's registration was found to be abusive due to lack of response and evidence of bad faith.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld; domain name ordered to be transferred to complainant.
Orders
- Transfer of the disputed domain name to the complainant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment