Mr K A Watson v Redpath Deilmann UK Ltd (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2024] UKET 6002046/2024 (21 November 2024)

The tribunal found that the claimant made a qualifying protected disclosure and was subjected to detriment by the respondent as a result, contrary to statutory protections.

Citation: [2024] UKET 6002046/2024
Parties: Claimant: Mr K A Watson; Respondent: Redpath Deilmann UK Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 21 November 2024
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing

Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Whistleblowing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Mr K A Watson

Claimant

Redpath Deilmann UK Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant made a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
2 Whether the claimant suffered detriment as a result of making a protected disclosure

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant made a qualifying protected disclosure and was subjected to detriment by the respondent as a result, contrary to statutory protections.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

The respondent is ordered to pay compensation to the claimant for detriment suffered as a result of making a protected disclosure.