Mr K Hepburn v Refinitiv Ltd (England and Wales : Age Discrimination) [2020] UKET 2601305/2019 (11 February 2020)
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that age was the reason for the treatment complained of. The respondent's actions were justified and not based on the claimant's age.
- Citation
- [2020] UKET 2601305/2019
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr K Hepburn; Respondent: Refinitiv Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 11 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Age Discrimination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr K Hepburn
Claimant
Refinitiv Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on the grounds of age
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that age was the reason for the treatment complained of. The respondent's actions were justified and not based on the claimant's age.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment