AA017622015 [2016] UKAITUR AA017622015 (19 February 2016)
AT is entitled to refugee protection because the risk of serious harm is linked to his Kurdish ethnicity, and there is no viable internal flight alternative; Judge Raikes erred in law by not recognising AT as a refugee.
- Citation
- [2016] UKAITUR AA017622015
- Parties
- Appellant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department; Respondent/appellant: AT
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Immigration and Asylum Appeal / Appeal to Upper Tribunal
- Outcome
- Secretary of State's appeal dismissed; AT's appeal allowed; AT recognised as refugee.
- Legal Topics
- Refugee Status, Humanitarian Protection, Internal Flight Alternative, Ethnic Persecution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Secretary of State for the Home Department
Appellant/respondent
AT
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Immigration and Asylum Appeal / Appeal to Upper Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 whether AT qualifies as a refugee under the Refugee Convention
- 2 whether AT is entitled to humanitarian protection under Article 15(c) of the Qualification Directive
- 3 whether internal flight alternative to Baghdad is unduly harsh
Ratio Decidendi
AT is entitled to refugee protection because the risk of serious harm is linked to his Kurdish ethnicity, and there is no viable internal flight alternative; Judge Raikes erred in law by not recognising AT as a refugee.
Court Disposition
Secretary of State's appeal dismissed; AT's appeal allowed; AT recognised as refugee.
Orders
- Decision and reasons statement of Judge Raikes set aside.
- AT found to be a refugee.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment