Mr H Smith v Regent Office Care Ltd (England and Wales : Age Discrimination : Breach of Contract : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations) [2017] UKET 1300644/2017 (16 August 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and suffered unlawful deductions from wages, but did not establish age discrimination or breach of Working Time Regulations.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2017] UKET 1300644/2017
Parties: Claimant: Mr H Smith; Respondent: Regent Office Care Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 16 August 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim partly upheld
Legal Topics: Age Discrimination, Breach of Contract, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Working Time Regulations

Employment Law Age Discrimination Breach of Contract Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages Working Time Regulations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

Mr H Smith

Claimant

Regent Office Care Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
2 Whether there was age discrimination
3 Whether there was a breach of contract

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and suffered unlawful deductions from wages, but did not establish age discrimination or breach of Working Time Regulations.

Court Disposition

Claim partly upheld

Orders

Compensation awarded for unfair dismissal
Compensation awarded for unlawful deduction from wages

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.