Luton Borough Council v Haque (Jurisdictional Points) [2017] UKEAT 0260_17_3107 (31 July 2017)
There is a compelling reason for the appeal to proceed to a Full Hearing due to the need for clarity on the statutory construction of time extension provisions under the early conciliation regime, though the underlying argument is not presently persuasive.
- Citation
- [2017] UKEAT 0260_17_3107
- Parties
- Claimant: Claimant; Respondent: Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal Tribunal / Rule 3(10) Application; Permission to Proceed to Full Hearing
- Outcome
- Permission granted for appeal to proceed to Full Hearing under Rule 3(10) EAT Rules 1993.
- Legal Topics
- Time Limits for Claims, Early Conciliation Regime, Statutory Construction of Extension Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Claimant
Claimant
Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal Tribunal / Rule 3(10) Application; Permission to Proceed to Full Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim was presented in time under statutory extension provisions
- 2 Interpretation of section 207B Employment Rights Act 1996
Ratio Decidendi
There is a compelling reason for the appeal to proceed to a Full Hearing due to the need for clarity on the statutory construction of time extension provisions under the early conciliation regime, though the underlying argument is not presently persuasive.
Court Disposition
Permission granted for appeal to proceed to Full Hearing under Rule 3(10) EAT Rules 1993.
Orders
- Matter to proceed to Full Hearing.
- Listing to be expedited and heard with any other appeals raising the same point.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment