JNJ Bricklaying Ltd v. Stacey & Ors [2003] UKEAT 0088_03_0807 (8 July 2003)
On the facts, the Applicants were workers and not carrying on a business undertaking; the Respondent was not a customer of such an undertaking. The Employment Tribunal's approach disclosed no error of law.
- Citation
- [2003] UKEAT 0088_03_0807
- Parties
- Appellant: Respondent; Respondents: Applicants Edwards, Hague, Palmer, Birtles, Leach, Stacey
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Worker Status, Business Undertaking Exception, Contract for Personal Service
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Respondent
Appellant
Applicants Edwards, Hague, Palmer, Birtles, Leach, Stacey
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicants were workers within the extended definition in limb (b) of Regulation 2 of WTR 1998
- 2 Whether the Respondent was a customer of a business undertaking carried on by the Applicants
Ratio Decidendi
On the facts, the Applicants were workers and not carrying on a business undertaking; the Respondent was not a customer of such an undertaking. The Employment Tribunal's approach disclosed no error of law.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No error of law found; Employment Tribunal decision stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment