2 Sisters Food Group Ltd v Abraityte & Ors (Practice and Procedure: Amendment) [2015] UKEAT 0209_15_1311 (13 November 2015)
Amendments to add or change Claimants' roles constitute new claims and must be considered for time limits; ET failed to fully engage with scope and time issues, rendering its decision unsafe.
- Citation
- [2015] UKEAT 0209_15_1311
- Parties
- Appellant: Respondent; Respondent: Claimants
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Preliminary Hearing Order Granting Amendment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Equal Pay, Equal Value Claims, Amendment of Pleadings, Time Limits, Case Management Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2
Parties
Respondent
Appellant
Claimants
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Preliminary Hearing Order Granting Amendment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether amendments to add/change Claimants' roles constitute new causes of action and are out of time
- 2 Whether the Employment Tribunal properly considered time limits and scope of amendments
- 3 Whether the ET exercised its discretion correctly in allowing amendments
Ratio Decidendi
Amendments to add or change Claimants' roles constitute new claims and must be considered for time limits; ET failed to fully engage with scope and time issues, rendering its decision unsafe.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Matter remitted to Employment Tribunal for reconsideration of amendments and time issues
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment