Icon Display Ltd v. Paine & Anor [2009] UKEAT 0438_09_2910 (29 October 2009)
Tribunal erred by failing to consider removal of privileged material from the file and by underestimating the risk of tribunal members being influenced by such material; appeal allowed and orders made for removal and transfer to ensure fair hearing.
- Citation
- [2009] UKEAT 0438_09_2910
- Parties
- Appellant: Respondents; Respondent: Claimants
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Tribunal Order
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Privileged Documents, Case Management, Transfer of Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Respondents
Appellant
Claimants
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Tribunal Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether privileged material should be removed from tribunal file
- 2 Whether case should be transferred to another tribunal to avoid risk of bias
Ratio Decidendi
Tribunal erred by failing to consider removal of privileged material from the file and by underestimating the risk of tribunal members being influenced by such material; appeal allowed and orders made for removal and transfer to ensure fair hearing.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Remove original pleadings and all documents and correspondence relating to privileged material from Ashford Tribunal file
- Transfer case to Croydon Tribunal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment