Alberg v Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX : Exemptions and reliefs) [2016] UKFTT 621 (TC) (05 September 2016)
The appellant failed to provide direct evidence that additional shares were issued to him. The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities, that the necessary steps for share issuance were not completed and thus the requirements of s131 Income Tax Act 2007 were not met. The appeal was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2016] UKFTT 621 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Richard Alberg; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 05 September 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax/corporation Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Share Loss Relief, Corporation Tax, Exemptions and Reliefs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Richard Alberg
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax/corporation Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant subscribed for shares in the company for the purposes of share loss relief under s131 Income Tax Act 2007
- 2 Whether circumstantial evidence is sufficient to infer that shares were issued
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to provide direct evidence that additional shares were issued to him. The Tribunal found, on the balance of probabilities, that the necessary steps for share issuance were not completed and thus the requirements of s131 Income Tax Act 2007 were not met. The appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The closure notice issued by HMRC in respect of the appellant’s 2008-09 tax return stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment