Moss & Coleman Solicitors v Kordowski [2007] DRS 4198 (1 February 2007)
Registration and use of a domain name identical to the complainant's trading name, even for criticism, constitutes abusive registration as it causes confusion, unfairly disrupts the complainant's business, and takes unfair advantage of the complainant's rights. Fair use for criticism does not justify such registration.
- Citation
- [2007] DRS 4198
- Parties
- Complainant: Moss and Coleman Solicitors; Respondent: Rick Kordowski
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 01 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Decision
- Outcome
- Domain name to be transferred to complainant
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Passing Off, Unregistered Trademark Rights, Freedom of Expression
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Moss and Coleman Solicitors
Complainant
Rick Kordowski
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name is an abusive registration in the hands of the respondent
- 3 Whether use of an identical domain name for criticism constitutes fair use under the DRS Policy
Ratio Decidendi
Registration and use of a domain name identical to the complainant's trading name, even for criticism, constitutes abusive registration as it causes confusion, unfairly disrupts the complainant's business, and takes unfair advantage of the complainant's rights. Fair use for criticism does not justify such registration.
Court Disposition
Domain name to be transferred to complainant
Orders
- The domain name mossandcoleman.co.uk is to be transferred to Moss and Coleman Solicitors.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment