Greenrose Network (Franchise) Ltd (t/a Country Properties) v Karpavicius [2009] DRS 6828 (08 May 2009)
The complainant established rights in the 'Country Properties' mark through secondary meaning, but failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the respondent was aware of the complainant or its rights at the time of registration or that the respondent's use constituted abusive registration under the Policy.
- Citation
- [2009] DRS 6828
- Parties
- Complainant: Greenrose Network (franchise) Limited; Respondent: Rimvydas Karpavicius
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute (nominet Drs) / Expert Decision
- Outcome
- Complaint dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Domain Names, Trade Marks, Abusive Registration, Secondary Meaning
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Greenrose Network (franchise) Limited
Complainant
Rimvydas Karpavicius
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute (nominet Drs) / Expert Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in the 'Country Properties' mark under the DRS Policy
- 2 Whether the respondent's registration and use of the domain name constitutes an abusive registration
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant established rights in the 'Country Properties' mark through secondary meaning, but failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the respondent was aware of the complainant or its rights at the time of registration or that the respondent's use constituted abusive registration under the Policy.
Court Disposition
Complaint dismissed
Orders
- No action to be taken in respect of the complaint
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment