Mr L Woodward v Ringway Infrastructure Services Ltd and Paul Anderson (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2020] UKET 1402594/2019 (29 May 2020)
The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure and that the respondents' actions were unlawful under the relevant statutory provisions.
- Citation
- [2020] UKET 1402594/2019
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr L Woodward; Respondent: Ringway Infrastructure Services Ltd; Respondent: Paul Anderson
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Mr L Woodward
Claimant
Ringway Infrastructure Services Ltd
Respondent
Paul Anderson
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure and that the respondents' actions were unlawful under the relevant statutory provisions.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld
Orders
- Respondents to pay compensation to the claimant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment