Tikit Limited v Rob Blown (Full Decision_No Action) [2011] DRS 9524 (21 April 2011)

Tikit Limited v Rob Blown (Full Decision_No Action) [2011] DRS 9524 (21 April 2011)

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2011] DRS 9524
Parties
Complainant: Tikit Limited; Respondent: Rob Blown
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
21 April 2011
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Marks, Passing Off
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trade Marks Passing Off

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tikit Limited

Complainant

Rob Blown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's registration or use of the domain name is abusive

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name