May v British Railways Board [1995] UKEAT 956_94_2310 (23 October 1995)
Adjournment granted to avoid risk of injustice to appellant who had limited legal aid and solicitors' involvement; justice requires appellant be afforded legal representation.
- Citation
- [1995] UKEAT 956_94_2310
- Parties
- Appellant: Robert May; Respondent: HM Counsel
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Pre Hearing Adjournment
- Outcome
- adjourned
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Appeal Procedure, Legal Aid, Adjournment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Parties
Robert May
Appellant
HM Counsel
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Pre Hearing Adjournment
Legal Issues
- 1 whether justice requires adjournment to allow appellant legal representation
- 2 whether appellant's unpreparedness justifies refusal of adjournment
Ratio Decidendi
Adjournment granted to avoid risk of injustice to appellant who had limited legal aid and solicitors' involvement; justice requires appellant be afforded legal representation.
Court Disposition
adjourned
Orders
- Appeal adjourned to 6 December.
- Appellant to submit amended grounds and skeleton argument by 24 November.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment