Privilege Insurance Company Ltd v Morrison [2006] DRS 3809 (17 August 2006)
The complainants established rights in the PRIVILEGE mark and demonstrated that the respondent's registration and use of the disputed domain name constituted abusive registration by diverting traffic, causing confusion, and engaging in a pattern of similar conduct.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2006] DRS 3809
- Parties
- Lead Complainant: The Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc; Complainant: Direct Line Insurance PLC; Complainant: Privilege Insurance Company Limited; Respondent: Robert Morrison
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Final Determination
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Trade Mark Infringement, Domain Name Disputes, Abusive Registration, Typosquatting
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc
Lead Complainant
Direct Line Insurance PLC
Complainant
Privilege Insurance Company Limited
Complainant
Robert Morrison
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainants have rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the disputed domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name in the hands of the respondent is an abusive registration
Ratio Decidendi
The complainants established rights in the PRIVILEGE mark and demonstrated that the respondent's registration and use of the disputed domain name constituted abusive registration by diverting traffic, causing confusion, and engaging in a pattern of similar conduct.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- transfer of the disputed domain name to The Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment