Roger Gall v IC (Freedom of Information Act 2000) [2010] UKFTT EA_2009_0078 (GRC) (13 January 2010)

The Tribunal held that the Information Commissioner correctly applied the relevant exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the refusal to disclose the information was lawful.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2010] UKFTT EA_2009_0078 (GRC)
Parties: Applicant: Roger Gall; Respondent: Information Commissioner
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 13 January 2010
Procedural Posture: Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome: appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Disclosure of Information, Public Authority Obligations

Freedom of Information Disclosure of Information Public Authority Obligations

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Roger Gall

Applicant

Information Commissioner

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the Information Commissioner correctly applied the Freedom of Information Act 2000 in refusing disclosure

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that the Information Commissioner correctly applied the relevant exemptions under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the refusal to disclose the information was lawful.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

No order as to costs

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.