Messer & Anor v. Balfour 2000 Ltd [2001] UKEAT 0159_01_2006 (20 June 2001)
The Tribunal correctly found that the applicants voluntarily resigned and were not constructively dismissed, and that the extension of trading hours did not constitute a breach of contract or violation of minimum wage laws.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 0159_01_2006
- Parties
- Appellant: Roger Messer; Appellant: Maureen Messer; Respondent: Balfour 2000 Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 20 June 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Constructive Dismissal, Breach of Contract, Minimum Wage
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Roger Messer
Appellant
Maureen Messer
Appellant
Balfour 2000 Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in law by dismissing claims of unfair constructive dismissal and breach of contract
- 2 Whether extension of trading hours without extra pay constituted breach of contract or violation of National Minimum Wage Act 1998
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal correctly found that the applicants voluntarily resigned and were not constructively dismissed, and that the extension of trading hours did not constitute a breach of contract or violation of minimum wage laws.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment