Mr D Cox v Royal Mail Group Ltd (England and Wales : Unfair Dismissal) [2017] UKET 2206610/2016 (17 February 2017)
The tribunal determined whether the dismissal was fair in all the circumstances, considering the procedures followed and the substantive reasons for dismissal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 2206610/2016
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr D Cox; Respondent: Royal Mail Group Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal Unfair Dismissal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr D Cox
Claimant
Royal Mail Group Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal Unfair Dismissal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed by the respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal determined whether the dismissal was fair in all the circumstances, considering the procedures followed and the substantive reasons for dismissal.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
[ Home ] [ Databases ] [ World Law ] [ Multidatabase Search ] [ Help ] [ Feedback ] [ DONATE ] United Kingdom Employment Tribunal You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom Employment Tribunal >> Mr D Cox v Royal Mail Group Ltd (England and Wales : Unfair Dismissal) [2017] UKET 2206610/2016 (17 February 2017) URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKET/2017/2206610_2016.html Cite as: [2017] UKET 2206610/2016 [ New search ] [ Printable PDF version ] [ Help ] Mr D Cox v Royal Mail Group Ltd (England and Wales : Unfair Dismissal) [2017] UKET 2206610/2016 (17 February 2017) A HTML version of this file is not available click here or view below the pdf version : [2017] UKET 2206610/2016 BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII URL: https://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKET/2017/2206610_2016.html