Royal Mail Group Ltd v Hunkin [2009] UKEAT 0507_08_2707 (27 July 2009)
The Employment Tribunal's decision was not Meek compliant as it failed to provide clear reasons for its findings of disability discrimination and unfair dismissal, making it impossible for the Respondent to understand why it lost. The case must be remitted for a fresh hearing before a differently constituted tribunal.
- Citation
- [2009] UKEAT 0507_08_2707
- Parties
- Appellant: Royal Mail Group Ltd; Respondent: Mr Hunkin
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Judgment set aside; case remitted for rehearing before a differently constituted tribunal.
- Legal Topics
- Reasonable Adjustments, Unfair Dismissal, Disability Discrimination Act 1995, Employment Rights Act 1996, Attendance Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Royal Mail Group Ltd
Appellant
Mr Hunkin
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the employer failed to make reasonable adjustments for a disabled employee
- 2 Whether the dismissal was unfair due to failure to investigate disability-related absences
- 3 Whether the Employment Tribunal's decision was Meek compliant
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal's decision was not Meek compliant as it failed to provide clear reasons for its findings of disability discrimination and unfair dismissal, making it impossible for the Respondent to understand why it lost. The case must be remitted for a fresh hearing before a differently constituted tribunal.
Court Disposition
Judgment set aside; case remitted for rehearing before a differently constituted tribunal.
Orders
- The Employment Tribunal's decision is set aside.
- The case is remitted for a fresh hearing before a differently constituted tribunal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment