Miss W Samagalska v Rushcliffe Care Group (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2017] UKET 2601867/2016 (9 February 2017)

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements, and therefore the claimant is entitled to a protective award.

Citation: [2017] UKET 2601867/2016
Parties: Claimant: Miss W Samagalska; Respondent: Rushcliffe Care Group
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 09 February 2017
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Protective Award, Collective Redundancy

Employment Law Protective Award Collective Redundancy

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Miss W Samagalska

Claimant

Rushcliffe Care Group

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements for collective redundancies
2 Whether the claimant is entitled to a protective award

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the respondent failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements, and therefore the claimant is entitled to a protective award.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

Respondent to pay a protective award to the claimant