Miss S Bi v Rushcliffe Care Group (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2017] UKET 2601868/2016 (10 August 2017)
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to consult as required by law, and therefore the claimant is entitled to a protective award.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 2601868/2016
- Parties
- Claimant: Miss S Bi; Respondent: Rushcliffe Care Group
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Protective Award, Collective Redundancy, Failure to Consult
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Miss S Bi
Claimant
Rushcliffe Care Group
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent failed to consult employees as required under collective redundancy provisions
- 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to a protective award
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to consult as required by law, and therefore the claimant is entitled to a protective award.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld
Orders
- Respondent to pay the claimant a protective award
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment