UI2022002674 [2023] UKAITUR UI2022002674 (24 August 2023)
The First-tier Tribunal judge's extensive and detailed questioning of the appellant amounted to excessive judicial intervention, giving the appearance of a second cross-examination and rendering the hearing unfair. This procedural unfairness required the decision to be set aside and the case remitted for a fresh hearing.
- Citation
- [2023] UKAITUR UI2022002674
- Parties
- Appellant: S A; Respondent: S S H D
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 24 August 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Immigration Appeal / Upper Tribunal Appeal From First Tier Tribunal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Intervention, Credibility Assessment, Medical Evidence in Asylum Claims, Internal Relocation, Fair Hearing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S A
Appellant
S S H D
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal / Upper Tribunal Appeal From First Tier Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the First-tier Tribunal judge's conduct amounted to unfairness due to excessive judicial intervention
- 2 Whether the credibility assessment of the appellant's account was legally adequate
- 3 Whether the medical evidence was properly considered
Ratio Decidendi
The First-tier Tribunal judge's extensive and detailed questioning of the appellant amounted to excessive judicial intervention, giving the appearance of a second cross-examination and rendering the hearing unfair. This procedural unfairness required the decision to be set aside and the case remitted for a fresh hearing.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- First-tier Tribunal decision set aside except as a record of the hearing
- Case remitted for a fresh hearing before a differently constituted tribunal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment