Ms I Rudzate v S B Security Solutions Ltd (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2020] UKET 2300857/2019 (7 January 2020)
The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by law and therefore could not have suffered detriment for making such a disclosure.
- Citation
- [2020] UKET 2300857/2019
- Parties
- Claimant: Ms I Rudzate; Respondent: S B Security Solutions Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 07 January 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Ms I Rudzate
Claimant
S B Security Solutions Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant made a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
- 2 Whether the claimant suffered detriment as a result of making a protected disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by law and therefore could not have suffered detriment for making such a disclosure.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment