Haddonstone Ltd v S.M (Full Decision _No Action) [2012] DRS 7556 (29 June 2012)

Haddonstone Ltd v S.M (Full Decision _No Action) [2012] DRS 7556 (29 June 2012)

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the registration was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Citation
[2012] DRS 7556
Parties
Complainant: Haddonstone Ltd; Respondent: S. M
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
29 June 2012
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Haddonstone Ltd

Complainant

S. M

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the registration of the disputed domain name is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the registration was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name