Mr K Y Fearn v S Rasul and others (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2023] UKET 1600869/2022 (2 February 2023)
The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by the Act and therefore was not entitled to protection or remedies under the legislation.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] UKET 1600869/2022
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr K Y Fearn; Respondent: S Rasul and others
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 02 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing
Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Whistleblowing
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr K Y Fearn
Claimant
S Rasul and others
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant made a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
- 2 Whether the claimant suffered detriment as a result of making the disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by the Act and therefore was not entitled to protection or remedies under the legislation.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment