J Sainsbury PLC Argos Limited v SAIDA KHAFIF (Full Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 18607 (18 May 2017)
The Panel found that the domain name is identical or similar to the Complainant's trademark, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and that the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
- Citation
- [2017] DRS 18607
- Parties
- Complainant: J Sainsbury PLC Argos Limited; Respondent: Saida Khafif
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 18 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J Sainsbury PLC Argos Limited
Complainant
Saida Khafif
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the Complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the Respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
- 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel found that the domain name is identical or similar to the Complainant's trademark, that the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and that the domain name was registered and is being used in bad faith.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the Complainant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment