UI2024000868 & Ors [2025] UKAITUR UI2024000868 (6 March 2025)
The appellants established both prior and present dependency on the EEA sponsor, with remittances necessary to meet their essential needs in Pakistan and sufficient resources available for their residence in the UK; thus, they qualify as extended family members under Regulation 8 of the Immigration (European...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] UKAITUR UI2024000868
- Parties
- Appellant: Saima Naeem; Appellant: Naeem Naeem; Appellant: Fatima Iqbal; Appellant: Bisma Iqbal; Respondent: Entry Clearance Officer
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Immigration Appeal / Remaking of Decision After Prior Tribunal Decisions Set Aside
- Outcome
- appeals allowed
- Legal Topics
- EEA Family Permits, Dependency, Extended Family Members, Citizens' Rights Directive, Prior and Present Dependency
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Saima Naeem
Appellant
Naeem Naeem
Appellant
Fatima Iqbal
Appellant
Bisma Iqbal
Appellant
Entry Clearance Officer
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal / Remaking of Decision After Prior Tribunal Decisions Set Aside
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether appellants qualify as extended family members under Regulation 8 of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016
- 2 Whether appellants were dependent on the EEA sponsor at the date of application
- 3 Whether present dependency is established for purposes of EEA Family Permit
Ratio Decidendi
The appellants established both prior and present dependency on the EEA sponsor, with remittances necessary to meet their essential needs in Pakistan and sufficient resources available for their residence in the UK; thus, they qualify as extended family members under Regulation 8 of the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 and their appeals are allowed.
Court Disposition
appeals allowed
Orders
- Decision of First-tier Tribunal dated 20 October 2023 set aside.
- Appeals of all four appellants remade and allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment