D Tanistra v Sakku Ltd (England and Wales : Redundancy) [2025] UKET 6012072/2025 (19 June 2025)

The tribunal found that the redundancy was not genuine and the respondent failed to follow a fair procedure, rendering the dismissal unfair.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2025] UKET 6012072/2025
Parties: Claimant: D Tanistra; Respondent: Sakku Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 19 June 2025
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: claim upheld
Legal Topics: Redundancy, Unfair Dismissal

Employment Law Redundancy Unfair Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

D Tanistra

Claimant

Sakku Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant's dismissal was a genuine redundancy
2 Whether the respondent followed a fair redundancy procedure

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the redundancy was not genuine and the respondent failed to follow a fair procedure, rendering the dismissal unfair.

Court Disposition

claim upheld

Orders

Respondent to pay compensation to claimant for unfair dismissal

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.