Notting Hill Genesis v Sarah Balding (Summary Decision _No Action) [2018] DRS 19523 (05 January 2018)

Notting Hill Genesis v Sarah Balding (Summary Decision _No Action) [2018] DRS 19523 (05 January 2018)

The adjudicator found that the evidence did not establish that the registration was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Citation
[2018] DRS 19523
Parties
Complainant: Notting Hill Genesis; Respondent: Sarah Balding
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
05 January 2018
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
No action
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Notting Hill Genesis

Complainant

Sarah Balding

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration by the respondent constitutes an abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The adjudicator found that the evidence did not establish that the registration was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

No action