Huntsmere Live Lusso Limited v Sarah Parker (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2018] DRS 20557 (05 October 2018)

The complainant established rights in the name, the respondent had no legitimate interest, and the domain name was registered and used in bad faith. Transfer of the domain name was ordered.

Citation: [2018] DRS 20557
Parties: Complainant: Huntsmere Live Lusso Limited; Respondent: Sarah Parker
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 05 October 2018
Procedural Posture: Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome: Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics: Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trade Mark Infringement

Intellectual Property Information Technology Domain Name Dispute Passing Off Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Huntsmere Live Lusso Limited

Complainant

Sarah Parker

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established rights in the name, the respondent had no legitimate interest, and the domain name was registered and used in bad faith. Transfer of the domain name was ordered.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

Transfer of the disputed domain name to Huntsmere Live Lusso Limited