DCM (Optical Holdings) Limited v Sasha Rodoy (Full Decision _No Action) [2012] DRS 11271 (15 August 2012)
The complainant failed to prove that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.
- Citation
- [2012] DRS 11271
- Parties
- Complainant: DCM (Optical Holdings) Limited; Respondent: Sasha Rodoy
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Complaint denied
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Trade Marks
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
DCM (Optical Holdings) Limited
Complainant
Sasha Rodoy
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant failed to prove that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.
Court Disposition
Complaint denied
Orders
- No action to be taken regarding the domain name
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment