SWAROVSKI AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT v Schramek (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2013] DRS 12691 (21 May 2013)
The Panel found that the domain name was identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark, that the Respondent had no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith. Accordingly, the domain name should be transferred to the Complainant.
- Citation
- [2013] DRS 12691
- Parties
- Complainant: SWAROVSKI AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT; Respondent: Schramek
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 21 May 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
- Outcome
- Transfer of domain name to Complainant
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SWAROVSKI AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Complainant
Schramek
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or similar to a trademark in which the Complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the Respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
- 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel found that the domain name was identical or confusingly similar to the Complainant's trademark, that the Respondent had no rights or legitimate interests in the domain name, and that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith. Accordingly, the domain name should be transferred to the Complainant.
Court Disposition
Transfer of domain name to Complainant
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the Complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment