Schuh Ltd v Kacperski (Unfair Dismissal : Reasonableness of dismissal) [2013] UKEAT 0050_12_1604 (16 April 2013)
The Employment Tribunal erred in law by applying too high a test for dismissal, requiring proven misconduct rather than a reasonable belief, and failed to adequately explain its reasoning regarding the Respondent's investigation and belief. The appeal succeeds and the case is remitted to a freshly constituted Tribunal.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] UKEAT 0050_12_1604
- Parties
- Respondent: Schuh; Claimant: Mr Kacperski
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; Employment Tribunal judgment set aside
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Reasonableness of Dismissal, Contributory Fault, Procedural Fairness
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Schuh
Respondent
Mr Kacperski
Claimant
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissal of the Claimant was unfair under section 98(2) Employment Rights Act 1996
- 2 Whether the Respondent conducted a reasonable investigation
- 3 Whether the Respondent had a reasonable belief in the Claimant's misconduct
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal erred in law by applying too high a test for dismissal, requiring proven misconduct rather than a reasonable belief, and failed to adequately explain its reasoning regarding the Respondent's investigation and belief. The appeal succeeds and the case is remitted to a freshly constituted Tribunal.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; Employment Tribunal judgment set aside
Orders
- Case remitted to a freshly constituted Employment Tribunal for rehearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment