DB Schenker Rail (UK) Ltd & Ors v Schunk GmbH & Ors [2014] CAT 2 (27 January 2014)
The Tribunal held that full and timely disclosure of documents relevant to the UK Claims is essential for the fair and efficient progression of the case. The Tribunal rejected both the Claimants' proposal to postpone disclosure and the Defendants' attempt to limit disclosure by a temporal filter, ordering comprehensive disclosure subject to confidentiality protections for leniency information. The Tribunal set an eight-week timetable for disclosure and established a confidentiality ring to protect sensitive information.
- Citation
- [2014] CAT 2
- Parties
- Claimant: DB Schenker Rail (UK) Ltd; Claimant: Loadhaul Limited; Claimant: Mainline Freight Limited; Claimant: Rail Express Systems Limited; Claimant: DB Schenker Rail International Limited (formerly English Welsh & Scottish Railway International Limited); Defendant: Schunk GmbH; Defendant: Schunk Kohlenstofftechnik GmbH; Defendant: SGL Carbon SE (formerly SGL Carbon AG); Defendant: Mersen SA (formerly Le Carbone-Lorraine SA); Defendant: Hoffmann & Co Elektrokohle AG
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Competition Damages Claim / Case Management Conference and Disclosure Directions
- Outcome
- Disclosure and case management directions granted as set out in the order.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure, Confidentiality Ring, Leniency Information, Case Management, Cartel Damages, Standard Disclosure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DB Schenker Rail (UK) Ltd
Claimant
Loadhaul Limited
Claimant
Mainline Freight Limited
Claimant
Rail Express Systems Limited
Claimant
DB Schenker Rail International Limited (formerly English Welsh & Scottish Railway International Limited)
Claimant
Schunk GmbH
Defendant
Schunk Kohlenstofftechnik GmbH
Defendant
SGL Carbon SE (formerly SGL Carbon AG)
Defendant
Mersen SA (formerly Le Carbone-Lorraine SA)
Defendant
Hoffmann & Co Elektrokohle AG
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Competition Damages Claim / Case Management Conference and Disclosure Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Appropriate scope and timing of disclosure in cartel damages claims
- 2 Application of confidentiality protections to disclosed documents
- 3 Treatment of leniency information in disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that full and timely disclosure of documents relevant to the UK Claims is essential for the fair and efficient progression of the case. The Tribunal rejected both the Claimants' proposal to postpone disclosure and the Defendants' attempt to limit disclosure by a temporal filter, ordering comprehensive disclosure subject to confidentiality protections for leniency information. The Tribunal set an eight-week timetable for disclosure and established a confidentiality ring to protect sensitive information.
Court Disposition
Disclosure and case management directions granted as set out in the order.
Orders
- Comprehensive disclosure by both Claimants and Defendants by 17 March 2014, subject to confidentiality ring and protection of leniency information.
- Defendants to provide English version of European Commission Decision with limited redactions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment