David Lloyd Leisure Limited v Scope Enterprises Inc (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2014] DRS 13996 (06 May 2014)

David Lloyd Leisure Limited v Scope Enterprises Inc (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2014] DRS 13996 (06 May 2014)

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name, the domain name was identical or similar, the respondent had no rights or legitimate interests, and the domain name was registered and used in bad faith.

Citation
[2014] DRS 13996
Parties
Complainant: David Lloyd Leisure Limited; Respondent: Scope Enterprises Inc
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
06 May 2014
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

David Lloyd Leisure Limited

Complainant

Scope Enterprises Inc

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name, the domain name was identical or similar, the respondent had no rights or legitimate interests, and the domain name was registered and used in bad faith.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.