One Call Insurance Services Limited v Scope Enterprises Inc (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2015] DRS 16575 (27 October 2015)

The complainant established rights in the name and the respondent's registration was found to be abusive under the DRS Policy, justifying transfer of the domain name.

Citation: [2015] DRS 16575
Parties: Complainant: One Call Insurance Services Limited; Respondent: Scope Enterprises Inc
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 27 October 2015
Procedural Posture: Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome: Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics: Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement

Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

One Call Insurance Services Limited

Complainant

Scope Enterprises Inc

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive
2 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established rights in the name and the respondent's registration was found to be abusive under the DRS Policy, justifying transfer of the domain name.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

Transfer of the disputed domain name to One Call Insurance Services Limited