Gumtree.com Limited v Searl Derman (Full Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 19115 (26 September 2017)
The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name, the registration was abusive, and the respondent had no legitimate interest in the domain name.
- Citation
- [2017] DRS 19115
- Parties
- Complainant: Gumtree.com Limited; Respondent: Searl Derman
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 September 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Transfer of domain name ordered
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Gumtree.com Limited
Complainant
Searl Derman
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive
- 2 Whether the complainant has rights in the name
- 3 Whether the respondent has legitimate interests in the domain name
Ratio Decidendi
The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name, the registration was abusive, and the respondent had no legitimate interest in the domain name.
Court Disposition
Transfer of domain name ordered
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment