Mr K Potter v Secure Employment Ltd: (England and Wales : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Written Pay Statement : Written Statements) [2017] UKET 1400187/2017 (4 April 2017)
The tribunal found that the respondent made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages and failed to provide the required written pay statement and written statements, in breach of statutory obligations.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 1400187/2017
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr K Potter; Respondent: Secure Employment Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Written Pay Statement, Written Statements
Employment Law Unlawful Deduction From Wages Written Pay Statement Written Statements
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Mr K Potter
Claimant
Secure Employment Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was an unlawful deduction from wages
- 2 Whether the claimant was provided with a written pay statement
- 3 Whether the claimant was provided with written statements of employment particulars
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the respondent made unlawful deductions from the claimant's wages and failed to provide the required written pay statement and written statements, in breach of statutory obligations.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld
Orders
- Respondent to pay the claimant the amount unlawfully deducted
- Respondent to provide the claimant with a written pay statement and written statements of employment particulars
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment