Ms H Sedman v Selecta UK Ltd (England and Wales : Equal Pay Act) [2019] UKET 1800160/2019 (26 June 2019)
The tribunal found that the claimant was paid less than a male comparator for equal work and that the respondent failed to provide a material factor defence unrelated to gender.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] UKET 1800160/2019
- Parties
- Claimant: Ms H Sedman; Respondent: Selecta UK Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Equal Pay Act, Gender Discrimination
Employment Law Equal Pay Act Gender Discrimination
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Ms H Sedman
Claimant
Selecta UK Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was paid less than a male comparator for equal work under the Equal Pay Act
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant was paid less than a male comparator for equal work and that the respondent failed to provide a material factor defence unrelated to gender.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld
Orders
- Respondent to pay the claimant the difference in pay
- Respondent to ensure equal pay going forward
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment