Winmau Dartboard Company Limited v SEO Dundee (Full Decision _Transfer) [2019] DRS 21078 (18 March 2019)
The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and mark, the domain name was similar, and the respondent's registration and use was unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights.
- Citation
- [2019] DRS 21078
- Parties
- Complainant: Winmau Dartboard Company Limited; Respondent: SEO Dundee
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Winmau Dartboard Company Limited
Complainant
SEO Dundee
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the domain name has been registered or is being used in a manner which takes unfair advantage of or is unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights
Ratio Decidendi
The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and mark, the domain name was similar, and the respondent's registration and use was unfairly detrimental to the complainant's rights.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment