VIII. Water of Leith Purification and Sewerage Order [1908] UKHL 1005_1 (22 July 1908)
The promoters were required to acquire the whole of the objectors' property if any part was taken for the sewage tank, but no obligation was imposed on the promoters to remove or alter the outfall pipe at their expense in the event of future harbour extension, and the local authority retained discretion over connection points to surface water drains.
- Citation
- [1908] UKHL 1005_1
- Parties
- Promoter: Water of Leith Purification Commissioners; Objector: Hailes Estate and Quarry Company, Limited; Objector: Trustees of Charles Ferrier Gordon; Objector: J. H. Dickson and H. Dickson, C.E.; Objector: John A. Inglis, of Redhall; Objector: Corporation of Edinburgh; Objector: Trustees of John Waddell, of Easter Inch; Objector: Commissioners of Leith Harbour and Docks; Objector: Governors of Gillespie's Hospital; Objector: White, Burns, & Company, and Others
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 1908
- Procedural Posture
- Provisional Order Confirmation / House of Lords Hearing
- Outcome
- Order confirmed with modifications
- Legal Topics
- Sewerage, Compulsory Acquisition, Surface Water Drainage, Public Authority Powers, Compensation for Land Acquisition
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Water of Leith Purification Commissioners
Promoter
Hailes Estate and Quarry Company, Limited
Objector
Trustees of Charles Ferrier Gordon
Objector
J. H. Dickson and H. Dickson, C.E.
Objector
John A. Inglis, of Redhall
Objector
Corporation of Edinburgh
Objector
Trustees of John Waddell, of Easter Inch
Objector
Commissioners of Leith Harbour and Docks
Objector
Governors of Gillespie's Hospital
Objector
White, Burns, & Company, and Others
Objector
Procedural Posture
Provisional Order Confirmation / House of Lords Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether promoters can compel proprietors to connect to surface water drains at their own expense
- 2 Whether promoters must acquire whole property if only part is taken for public works
- 3 Whether obligation should be imposed on promoters to remove/alter sewer outfall pipe at their expense if required by harbour extension
Ratio Decidendi
The promoters were required to acquire the whole of the objectors' property if any part was taken for the sewage tank, but no obligation was imposed on the promoters to remove or alter the outfall pipe at their expense in the event of future harbour extension, and the local authority retained discretion over connection points to surface water drains.
Court Disposition
Order confirmed with modifications
Orders
- Promoters required to acquire whole of Waddell trustees' property if any part is taken
- No obligation imposed on promoters to remove or alter outfall pipe for harbour extension
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment