Sanofi-aventis v Shaun Breen [2007] DRS 4747 (3 September 2007)
The respondent registered the domain names to divert business to his own competing website, taking unfair advantage of and disrupting the complainant's rights in the ACOMPLIA mark. The use of the domain names is likely to cause confusion among the public as to the origin or association of the products. The registration and use constitute abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy.
- Citation
- [2007] DRS 4747
- Parties
- Complainant: Sanofi-aventis; Respondent: Shaun Breen
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 03 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Trade Marks, Passing Off, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sanofi-aventis
Complainant
Shaun Breen
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in respect of a name or mark identical or similar to the domain names
- 2 Whether the domain names in the hands of the respondent constitute abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent registered the domain names to divert business to his own competing website, taking unfair advantage of and disrupting the complainant's rights in the ACOMPLIA mark. The use of the domain names is likely to cause confusion among the public as to the origin or association of the products. The registration and use constitute abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld
Orders
- Transfer of the domain names buyacompliapills.co.uk, acompliadietpills.co.uk, and acompliapills.co.uk to the complainant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment