Mr P Roddis v Sheffield Hallam University (England and Wales : Part Time Workers) [2019] UKET 2802764/2012 (23 April 2019)
The Tribunal held that the claimant and the comparator were engaged under the same type of contract and that the claimant had been treated less favourably without objective justification, thus breaching the Regulations.
- Citation
- [2019] UKET 2802764/2012
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr P Roddis; Respondent: Sheffield Hallam University
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Part Time Workers, Less Favourable Treatment, Comparator Analysis
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr P Roddis
Claimant
Sheffield Hallam University
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant, a part-time associate lecturer, was treated less favourably than a full-time comparator in breach of the Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that the claimant and the comparator were engaged under the same type of contract and that the claimant had been treated less favourably without objective justification, thus breaching the Regulations.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld
Orders
- Respondent to compensate claimant for less favourable treatment
- Respondent to review employment practices to ensure compliance with Regulations
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment