SHIVANI MATHUR v Revenue & Customs (INCOME TAX - ITEPA 2003 section 401 - taxpayer received £6 million payment from former employer in settlement...) [2022] UKFTT 88 (TC) (09 March 2022)
The Tribunal held that the £6 million settlement payment was received in connection with the termination of Ms Mathur's employment within the meaning of s401 ITEPA 2003. The payment settled claims arising from both pre-termination conduct and the termination itself, but the statutory language is broad and captures such global settlements. Only a limited portion of the payment (£44,000), corresponding to the upper Vento band for injury to feelings, could be exempt under s406 ITEPA. The remainder was taxable as employment income.
- Citation
- [2022] UKFTT 88
- Parties
- Appellant: Shivani Mathur; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2022
- Procedural Posture
- First Tier Tribunal (tax) Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal Against HMRC Closure Notice Regarding Tax Treatment of Settlement Payment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax (earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 S401, Taxation of Settlement Payments, Employment Termination, Discrimination Claims, Apportionment of Damages, Exception for Injury to Feelings (s406 Itepa)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Shivani Mathur
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
First Tier Tribunal (tax) Appeal / Final Judgment on Appeal Against HMRC Closure Notice Regarding Tax Treatment of Settlement Payment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the £6 million settlement payment received by Ms Mathur from her former employer was taxable under s401 ITEPA 2003 as a payment in connection with the termination of employment
- 2 Whether any part of the settlement payment was exempt from tax under s406 ITEPA as compensation for injury to feelings
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that the £6 million settlement payment was received in connection with the termination of Ms Mathur's employment within the meaning of s401 ITEPA 2003. The payment settled claims arising from both pre-termination conduct and the termination itself, but the statutory language is broad and captures such global settlements. Only a limited portion of the payment (£44,000), corresponding to the upper Vento band for injury to feelings, could be exempt under s406 ITEPA. The remainder was taxable as employment income.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed. The closure notice and HMRC's amendment to Ms Mathur's tax return stand, with only £44,000 of the settlement payment exempt under s406 ITEPA as compensation for injury to feelings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment